“Undergo surgery in an operating theatre to remove their organs while still alive”
An interesting and at the same time highly disturbing article published in Intensive Care Medicine volume 45, pages1309–1311(2019) discusses the procurement of organs for transplants from people who may want euthanasia or assisted suicide, and who, instead of achieving their goal via the usual procedure, agree to undergo surgery in an operating theatre to remove their organs while still alive. This has been called “death by donation”, i.e. these people die when their organs are removed.
The issue arises due to the shortage of organs for transplant in most developed countries, resulting in long waiting lists of patients who require a transplant.
Faced with this problem, the article in question mentions “off the table” solutions for these patients, such as resorting to the “black market” in underdeveloped countries, and asking if we would consider other options, such as obtaining them from a living person who wishes to die and who offers to donate their organs in the same surgical procedure that will bring about their death.
Euthanizing patients for their organs
At various international medical conferences held in 2018-2019, many discussions centered around “donation after death”, which it seems is already being practiced in countries like Canada (see HERE) and the Benelux countries (see HERE), where euthanasia or assisted suicide are legal.
Harvesting organs from patients that undergow assisted death and suicide
According to the author, so-called “Imminent Death Donation” refers to terminally-ill patients requesting euthanasia who are willing to donate their organs, while “by death donation” may include volunteers who have no illness, i.e. healthy people who want to commit suicide.
Bioethical objective problem of the so called “death by donation”
The main bioethical problem is that “death by donation” infringes upon a deeply rooted medical standard that that prohibits the harvesting of organs for donation until the donor is declared dead. Thus, “death by donation” would, at present, be considered homicide for ending a human life, even if it is for a seemingly good end, namely procuring organs for donation.
Would the entire team of medical professionals (havesting -transplantation) consent to participate in this clearly homicidal medical act?
In addition to all this, and when attributing ethical responsibilities to those who participate in these acts, we must bear in mind that in euthanasia practices or in assisted suicide, the intervention of only one physician is necessary, while “death by donation” requires a full team of medical professionals. So the question is, would the entire team of medical professionals consent to participate in this clearly homicidal medical act? Moreover, would the organ recipient also consent to receive organs from a living person who offered to die so that their organs could be harvested?
Euthanasia carried out without being requested
It is certainly another step in the mad race to end human lives, because in our view, “death by donation” is a homicidal act, as is euthanasia. This is especially true if—as is attested to in another article in the New England Journal of Medicine (reference 16 of the article)—of the 3882 deaths from euthanasia or assisted suicide performed in the Netherlands and Belgium in 2013, 1047 (27%) were carried out without being requested by the patients, and consequently without their consent.
Bioethics Observatory – Institute of Life Sciences
Catholic University of Valencia