Human rights, artificial intelligence and neurolaw. From Karel Vašák to human rights 4.0
INTRODUCTION Pérez Luño (2010, p. 50) defines human rights as [...]
Pharmaceutical Sanofi must compensate women who were treated with the drug Depakine
On March 17, the insurer of the pharmaceutical company Sanofi [...]
One of Us publishes statement against war in Ukraine
The European federation "One of Us", of which the Bioethics [...]
Macron intends to incorporate abortion into the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
The President of France, Emmanuel Macron, has asked the European [...]
Status of women in India and sex-selective abortion. A review
On the last International Women’s Day (March 8, 2021) an [...]
Ageism in COVID-19 pandemic
Updated 9/14/2021 The term ageism was coined in the English language in [...]
Has the ‘holy grail’ of ideal embryo selection been found?
In 2015, our Observatory published an article about the quest [...]
Vaccine passport rollout will be a way to gradually recover the right of freedom of movement
The vaccine passport has become a matter of debate from [...]
A review of current Human Trafficking. America is the country with more available data
Human trafficking is an issue that characterizes our complex developed [...]
![Surrogacy is prohibited in almost all Western countries, but the industry of surrogacy continues to grow. Recently, for example, New York State (US) legislation announced its support for commercial contracts between the surrogate mother and the intended parents, who may or may not be the child’s biological parents. Institutions defending women’s and children’s rights are strongly opposed to this practice. Indeed it is the first time that an assisted reproduction technology (ART) procedure has been regulated by a commercial contract. We have published several articles on this subject, which our readers can read HERE. Last March, an issue of the European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Volume 258 – Pages 1-8) published a review article entitled Bioethical issues and legal frameworks of surrogacy: A global perspective about the right to health and dignity. The main question is if surrogacy is prohibited in so many Western countries, how do we explain the rapid increase in the number of surrogate children in these same countries? In this respect, our Observatory published two articles showing the medical, ethical, and social difficulties of surrogacy (read HERE). We have also published a scientific paper in The Linacre Quarterly, entitled Gestational Surrogacy: Current View. Read related article HERE The authors of the aforementioned review propose a solution: “The lack of regulation on cross-border surrogacy in low-income countries can undermine the dignity and rights of women as even modest economic compensation determines a significant purchasing power. The international effort should be aimed at creating an international regulatory framework from which guidelines useful to national governments derive. An international agreement would provide a solid legal basis for the protection of surrogate women. In order to limit the economic interests linked to procreative tourism, so as to truly protect global health and women’s rights, legislative uniformity is, therefore, necessary between the various states [our emphasis]”. From our perspective, the authors proposed solution of creating “guidelines useful to national governments” would legalize a practice that has objective ethical problems, namely the objectification of the mother and child and the well-know](https://bioethicsobservatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/surrogate-mother-uk-media-3-e1519726385411.jpg)
Babies born from a surrogate mother. Who has parental responsibility before the intended parents obtain the parental order?
The parent consent responsibility for babies before parental or adoption [...]